Graffiti! Evidence Our Justice Systems Are Rigged To deprive women of basic and equal human rights!
United States Federal District Court for Northern Ohio
Jane filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio seeking justice against an uncle whom she alleges sexually abused and repeatedly raped her from the age of five through her teenage years. Her goal was simple: to hold the man she identified as her abuser accountable while he was still alive.
Approximately six months after filing her complaint, Jane received a written order from the court dismissing her case. According to Jane, the order stated that her lawsuit was "frivolous" and constituted harassment of the defendant. She further states that the court prohibited her from filing additional pleadings in the federal court system without prior authorization.
From Jane's perspective, the dismissal was devastating. She believes she was denied the opportunity to present her allegations before the court. According to her account, no evidentiary hearing was held, no subpoenas were issued, and no witnesses were called. She further states that no referral was made to law enforcement for a criminal investigation into her allegations.
At the time, Jane alleges that the accused continued working at a local hospital on a psychiatric unit, where he had regular contact with vulnerable patients, including women and, according to her understanding, minors receiving psychiatric care.
Jane believes the judicial process failed not only her but other survivors seeking justice. She questions why taxpayers fund a federal judiciary that, in her view, can dismiss serious allegations without allowing them to be fully examined in court. She points to the substantial public salaries paid to federal judges and asks whether survivors receive meaningful access to justice when their claims are dismissed before any factual record is developed.
Jane also states that she later discovered what she believes were alterations or irregularities within the federal court's electronic docket concerning her case. She believes these changes warrant independent review. If accurate, she argues, such conduct would undermine public confidence in the integrity of the judicial process. She emphasizes that this reflects her personal observations and concerns and that she believes they deserve independent investigation.
Her broader concern extends beyond her own experience. She believes that survivors of childhood sexual abuse often encounter additional barriers when they seek justice through the legal system. In her view, the trauma does not necessarily end with the abuse itself; it can continue when survivors feel unheard, dismissed, or denied an opportunity to present their claims.
Jane asks a difficult question: How can survivors feel safe seeking justice if they believe the institutions designed to protect them fail to investigate their allegations? She questions why hardworking taxpayers—many working long hours to support themselves and their families—should accept a system that, in her opinion, does not adequately protect women and children or ensure accountability when serious allegations are brought before the courts.
Whether one agrees with Jane's conclusions or not, her story reflects the frustration, grief, and determination of a survivor who believes she was denied the opportunity to have her allegations fully heard.
Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan's Representative States Congressman Jordan Represents the States Fiscal Responsibilities and Not The Interests of the People!
Another story out of Ohio,
According to Sarah, she contacted the office of Congressman Jim Jordan seeking assistance regarding what she describes as a case involving violent child sexual abuse and subsequent retaliation, including what she believes was an attempt on her life intended to prevent her from pursuing the matter.
Sarah states that she was informed by a member of the congressman's staff that there was nothing the office could do to assist her. She then requested the office's help in pursuing a private bill through Congress as a possible avenue for relief. According to Sarah, the staff member responded that Congressman Jordan's role was to represent the state's "fiscal" responsibilities rather than the interests of individual constituents in matters such as hers.
Sarah believes the response reflected a broader failure of public officials to assist survivors seeking accountability. In her view, elected representatives should ensure that constituents with serious allegations know what resources are available and, when appropriate, help direct them to the agencies or processes that may be able to provide assistance.
Columbus Ohio Domestic Court finds attempted murder as domestic violence
A Story of Violence, System Failure, and Unanswered Questions
This is not an easy story to read.
In the days before a court hearing, a 22-year-old woman reported to responding police officers that she had survived a prolonged and violent assault by her partner. According to her statement, he repeatedly kicked and struck her, dragged her down a flight of stairs by her hair, forced her to the floor multiple times, and eventually pinned her to the ground.
She reported that he climbed onto her chest, held her down with his knees, and wrapped both hands around her neck. She later described knowing she was going to die because she could not breathe or remove his hands, her eyes were bulging and the room was going dark. According to her account, it was the couple's children who intervened by climbing onto the man's back, allowing her to escape the strangulation.
She further reported that after the assault, the man ripped the telephone from the wall and threw it so she could not call for help, then prevented her and the children from leaving the home until the following morning.
When police arrived, the woman observed officers separate the suspect from the residence. She watched as he was handcuffed and taken into custody. According to court records as the author understands them, the defendant was charged with felony domestic violence rather than attempted murder.
At the subsequent court hearing, the defendant entered a guilty plea to the domestic violence charge. He was sentenced to probation after spending several days in jail.
According to the author's account, the defendant later left Ohio in violation of the terms of his probation and relocated to Pennsylvania with the children. The author alleges that the children remained there for many years and experienced abuse, neglect, and deprivation during that period.
The author further alleges that the father obtained public assistance by making false statements regarding the children's residence and family circumstances while failing to disclose substantial income. The author believes state agencies possessed records that contradicted those statements but failed to intervene.
According to the author, Ohio authorities did not pursue the alleged probation violation, and Pennsylvania authorities likewise failed to take action that would have protected the children or returned the defendant to Ohio.
The author also states that, approximately eight months later, the same individual was convicted in a separate case involving the shooting of a police officer. Despite that conviction, the author believes no meaningful action was taken to recover the children or address the earlier probation violation.
For the author, this story is not simply about one violent assault. It represents what they view as a broader failure of institutions charged with protecting victims and children. The author believes that when probation violations go unenforced, reports of abuse are not fully investigated, or agencies fail to coordinate, the consequences can extend far beyond a single case and affect entire families for years.
Whether others agree with that conclusion or not, the author views this case as an example of how failures within the justice system can leave victims believing that violence continued because opportunities for intervention were missed.
A Recent Case Out of Biddeford Maine, Biddeford judge condones landlord sexual violence
Lori has been living in motel rooms since she moved to Maine more than a year ago. Working full time while attending the University of Southern Maine means she works up to 80 hours a week, so she really didn’t mind the temporary living situation, although she yearned for something more stable, a place she could call, “her own.” Housing is expensive in most of the habitable parts of Maine, upwards of $2,000 a month for a one bedroom, and many landlords require 3 months as security for renting. She finally found an apartment she could not have afforded at $1,400 without her federal student aid package. Being from a small town like Biddeford, Lori thought she could trust these people, who seemed like “nice people.” Maine's winters are notoriously cold, long and harsh and electric bills are usually nothing to sneeze at. She made sure she asked the owner about the electric bills before she agreed to rent the unit, and was told the bill usually runs around $100-$200 a month through the winter. On the day she moved in, she discovered the heating system was not working and immediately notified her landlord. 3 weeks later, hundreds of text messages, several hours of phone calls, and several hours of waiting for heating technicians to appear-the heating system was still not working and her electric bill was almost $600. The owner put their statement in writing, “we will agree to let you move out and refund your security deposit if you move by this Friday.” Lori agreed, and moved back into a motel room. When the text message concerning the return of her security deposit didn't arrive, she made the first move and texted them, “Hello, what about my $1,400 security deposit?” She did not receive a message back for 2 weeks, along with the message that she was being charged for destroying the property and leaving her trash all over, plus the cost of the heating technician appointments. Thankfully (she thought) I took photos of every room, crook and nanny before I left and saved all of their text messages. She filed the case in the small claims court, assuming it would be the best manner of resolution. Some of the text messages had included insults, calling her dirty, and referring to her also as being poor, and cheap. She eagerly awaited the date of the hearing, and was disappointed when the defendants failed to file a response, as she assumed it would be a lengthy process to collect on the soon to be entered judgement in her favor when the Defendants failed to appear. 3 days before the date of the hearing she messaged her previous landlords to say “the hearing is Monday, if you just don't appear the court will rule against you.” The husband of the owner team messaged Lori back with a photo of his penis. The first thing Lori did was call the police, go to their offices and attempt to file a criminal complaint. The police refused to take the complaint. Lori assumed the judge would at least acknowledge the crime and her right to be free from sexual violence. The hearing went well for her, the defendants did appear, and the husband did admit he sent the photo, along with the statement he had meant to send a photo of his leg.” She had all of her evidence prepared and presented it accurately including receipts, text messages and the photos proving these people were lying and abusing her and trying to steal from her. After a week long consideration of the evidence, Judge Le-Anne Sutton ruled in favor of the defendants, and ordered only the amount of the cost of an appeal be awarded to the plaintiff, along with the statement that the text message sent by the plaintiff was perceived as “threatening” and hence it was therefore understandable that the man/defendant had sent her a photo of his penis in response, she deserved it. 7 months later, Lori is still living in a motel room unable to afford an apartment because of the money the defendants and the court stole from her.